← All exhibitions
ExhibitionsWorld Atlases

Resources and Environment: World Atlas

World Atlases

4 atlases1996–19991 language2 reviews4 editors’ accounts

Resources and Environment: World Atlas emerged from a long-running programme of world environmental and resource mapping associated with I. P. Gerasimov. The supplied accounts describe more than 25 years of work leading to a printed atlas and a GIS atlas. Published records include the digital ArcAtlas: Our Earth and the two-volume Resources and Environment: World Atlas. Continental maps excluded from the printed atlas supplied material for the GIS project, linking the publications through their production history.

Versions and Their Documents

Version 1

1996

ArcAtlas: Our Earth is recorded as an English-language computer program dated 1996. A 2012 retrospective dates the GIS project’s start to 1993: a cartography laboratory worked with Data+, supported technically and financially by ESRI, using ArcInfo and ArcView to digitize and coordinate continental maps omitted from the printed atlas and prepare English texts. It records a first presentation at the International Cartographic Conference in Stockholm in 1997. Michael N. DeMers and Jeffrey S. Vincent’s 2008 classroom account describes more than forty thematic maps and one hundred satellite images covering physical and human geography, including climate, soils, vegetation, wildlife, population, economics and land use. Their teaching example overlays historical and current lion ranges with environmental layers to investigate spatial relationships.

Atlases

ArcAtlas: Our Earth

ArcAtlas: Our Earth

1996 · ENDigital

Reviews & Reception

2008PDF
This article examines how geographic information systems (GIS) and the ArcAtlas: Our Earth database can support inquiry-based geography education by developing students’ ability to identify, describe, explain, and predict spatial patterns. A central obstacle to integrating GIS into K–12 and introductory college courses is the limited availability of affordable, accessible, and thematically diverse spatial data, particularly for teachers without specialist GIS training or sufficient time to construct databases. ArcAtlas addresses this problem by providing more than forty digital thematic maps and one hundred satellite images covering human and physical topics, including climate, hydrology, geology, soils, vegetation, wildlife, population, economics, land use, and land cover. Although the database and some of its formats are dated, its continental-scale coverage and compatibility with GIS software make it a practical resource for educational activities. The article presents a lesson designed primarily for students in grades 10–12, community colleges, and introductory non-GIS university courses. Implemented in ArcGIS 9.x but adaptable to other platforms, the lesson emphasizes a simple graphical interface, advance teacher preparation, demonstrations, sequenced screenshots, and focused data selection so that students attend to geographic reasoning rather than software manipulation. The model exercise investigates historical and current lion distributions by overlaying range maps with vegetation and other physical or socioeconomic layers. Students classify vegetation zones, observe spatial correspondences, consider discrepancies caused by mapping scale, classification, and multiple interacting variables, and propose additional factors that may explain the contraction of lion habitat. They then produce maps and a final report explaining relationships among lion ranges, vegetation, soils, prey, land use, population, and other influences; predicting future distributions under continuing trends; and recommending strategies that balance wildlife conservation with human needs. The activity progresses from observation and description to analysis, explanation, prediction, and evaluation, and is explicitly connected to Bloom’s Taxonomy through stated learning objectives and an assessment rubric. It also addresses numerous National Geography Standards, especially the use of maps and geospatial technologies, analysis of spatial organization, understanding of ecosystems and human–environment interaction, and application of geography to interpret the past, assess the present, and plan for the future. Suggested extensions include intersection overlays to isolate areas of range loss, analysis of land-use and socioeconomic change, and comparison with prey-species distributions. Overall, the article argues that ArcAtlas can reduce the data and preparation barriers facing educators while enabling flexible, problem-based GIS lessons. Its educational value lies less in teaching advanced GIS operations than in using visual display and spatial overlay to cultivate geographic inquiry, critical thinking, independent hypothesis formation, and evidence-based environmental decision making.Expand ↓

This article examines how geographic information systems (GIS) and the ArcAtlas: Our Earth database can support inquiry-based geography education by developing students’ ability to identify, describe, explain, and predict spatial patterns. A central obstacle to integrating GIS into K–12 and introductory college courses is the limited availability of affordable, accessible, and thematically diverse spatial data, particularly for teachers without specialist GIS training or sufficient time to construct databases. ArcAtlas addresses this problem by providing more than forty digital thematic maps and one hundred satellite images covering human and physical topics, including climate, hydrology, geology, soils, vegetation, wildlife, population, economics, land use, and land cover. Although the database and some of its formats are dated, its continental-scale coverage and compatibility with GIS software make it a practical resource for educational activities. The article presents a lesson designed primarily for students in grades 10–12, community colleges, and introductory non-GIS university courses. Implemented in ArcGIS 9.x but adaptable to other platforms, the lesson emphasizes a simple graphical interface, advance teacher preparation, demonstrations, sequenced screenshots, and focused data selection so that students attend to geographic reasoning rather than software manipulation. The model exercise investigates historical and current lion distributions by overlaying range maps with vegetation and other physical or socioeconomic layers. Students classify vegetation zones, observe spatial correspondences, consider discrepancies caused by mapping scale, classification, and multiple interacting variables, and propose additional factors that may explain the contraction of lion habitat. They then produce maps and a final report explaining relationships among lion ranges, vegetation, soils, prey, land use, population, and other influences; predicting future distributions under continuing trends; and recommending strategies that balance wildlife conservation with human needs. The activity progresses from observation and description to analysis, explanation, prediction, and evaluation, and is explicitly connected to Bloom’s Taxonomy through stated learning objectives and an assessment rubric. It also addresses numerous National Geography Standards, especially the use of maps and geospatial technologies, analysis of spatial organization, understanding of ecosystems and human–environment interaction, and application of geography to interpret the past, assess the present, and plan for the future. Suggested extensions include intersection overlays to isolate areas of range loss, analysis of land-use and socioeconomic change, and comparison with prey-species distributions. Overall, the article argues that ArcAtlas can reduce the data and preparation barriers facing educators while enabling flexible, problem-based GIS lessons. Its educational value lies less in teaching advanced GIS operations than in using visual display and spatial overlay to cultivate geographic inquiry, critical thinking, independent hypothesis formation, and evidence-based environmental decision making.

Version 2

1998–1999

Volumes 1 and 2 of Resources and Environment: World Atlas were published in English in 1998 by the Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, and Ed. Hölzel. N. N. Komedchikov’s 2005 account traces the project to an initiative by I. P. Gerasimov. Associated records include G. D. Richter and I. N. Chuklenkova’s 1983 text on mapping the natural environment and natural resources, and Gerasimov’s 1985 methodological work on maps for a comprehensive atlas of the Earth’s environment and resources. The supplied material does not detail the contents of individual volumes. A separate 1999 journal article is titled The Earth's Nature and Resources: A Comprehensive Geographical Atlas of the World.

Atlases

Resources and Environment: World Atlas, Vol. 2

Resources and Environment: World Atlas, Vol. 2

1998 · EN
Resources and Environment: World Atlas, Vol. 1

Resources and Environment: World Atlas, Vol. 1

1998 · EN
The Earth's Nature and Resources: A Comprehensive Geographical Atlas of the World

The Earth's Nature and Resources: A Comprehensive Geographical Atlas of the World

1999 · ENDigital

Editors’ Accounts

2012PDF

Atlases. A school of co-creation

Н. Н. Дрейер; Владимир Михайлович Котляков; Николай Николаевич Комедчиков

Reviews & Reception

From the Physical Collection

Photographs are being prepared for this hall.

More halls in World Atlases