Book review. General Atlas of Congo

Summary

This paper presents critical reviews of three works within African studies. First, a brief notice praises a publication on black African art by a pupil of von Sydow, highlighting its utility for researchers while noting that a fortuitous discovery raises concerns about possible further finds. Second, a detailed evaluation is offered of Van Bulck’s 1954 language map of Congo. The reviewer commends the map’s overall design, its prioritization of linguistic over ethnic criteria, and the emerging consensus on language nomenclature. However, several classificatory inaccuracies are identified: Mbanja is treated as a separate language rather than a Banda dialect; the Megye group belongs to Eastern Sudanic, not as isolated; Kaonde aligns with Luba, not Bemba; and the Maniema group requires clearer demarcation. Omitted dialects, confusing orthographic choices, and ethnically motivated splits that lack linguistic basis further weaken the work. Third, a review of M. Slater’s book on Jomo Kenyatta’s trial criticizes its one‑sided defense plea. The reviewer argues that despite difficulties in the prosecution’s case and witness retractions, the judge reasonably convicted Kenyatta, who exploited land grievances, established mission‑opposing schools, and tacitly endorsed Mau Mau violence without ever formally condemning it. The trial exposed how land dispossession can be manipulated by an unscrupulous agitator. Together, these reviews contribute to scholarship in African art, linguistics, and history.