National geographic atlas of Czechoslovakia
Национальный географический атлас Чехословакии
- Publication
- Известия Академии наук СССР. Серия географическая
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 136-141
Summary
This article critically reviews the 1966 National Atlas of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, situating it within the country’s cartographic tradition and assessing its scientific, practical, and design achievements. Building on the 1935 national atlas and extensive postwar research in general, thematic, and techno-economic cartography, the new atlas synthesizes multidisciplinary information on the national territory. The review examines its organization, thematic coverage, cartographic methods, visual language, and coordination among maps. More than 400 maps, generally at scales between 1:1,000,000 and 1:6,000, are arranged so that each sheet forms a coherent thematic unit combining maps with explanatory texts, tables, and graphs. Natural-science maps account for approximately one-third of the atlas and encompass geophysics, geology, geomorphology, soils, climate, hydrology, and biogeography. Particular strengths include the geological and tectonic maps, the extensive set of climatic maps, and sophisticated legends that integrate age, lithology, genesis, and regional variation. The atlas is especially successful in coordinating related map contents, thereby revealing connections among geological structure, tectonics, relief, Quaternary deposits, vegetation, and precipitation. Social and economic maps constitute about two-thirds of the work and cover population, industry, agriculture, transport, communications, culture, living conditions, health care, and education. These sections combine scientific reference functions with practical applications in economic planning and the territorial allocation of productive forces. Population maps clarify labor distribution, commuting, migration, urbanization, and relationships between settlement patterns, economic sectors, resources, and environmental conditions. Industrial and agricultural sections present both structural patterns and historical change, while detailed transport maps demonstrate innovative treatment of network density, traffic intensity, freight volume, and commodity structure. Maps of housing, retail trade, household services, and public welfare broaden the atlas beyond conventional economic geography, although foreign-trade maps and some health, education, and cultural representations are judged comparatively schematic or methodologically conventional. The authors conclude that the atlas is an outstanding integrated cartographic work whose major achievements lie in thematic breadth, cross-map comparability, carefully selected symbols, vivid yet readable color design, and the effective synthesis of natural and socioeconomic knowledge. It surpasses many comparable Western European publications and demonstrates the scientific maturity, long-standing traditions, and high production standards of Czechoslovak cartography.
Related Atlases
Comments
Loading...
0/2000